Monopolistic
Competition in the Gadgets Industry is not just the current issue that
countries face nowadays, but it is an economical issue that is faced all year
long by the retailers in the market. The gadget industry is comprised of
thousands of different brands and companies. However each is defined by its
quality of make and materials used. Apple, Blackberry, and Android are all
well-known and respected brand names. However if prices were to exceed what people
are willing to pay, then the consumers would alter their preferences and buy
from another brand. Therefore we are dealing with a monopolistic competition.
Monopolistic
competition is often defined as a common form of industry structure
characterized by a large number of firms, none of which can influence market
price by virtue of size alone, as some degree of market power is achieved by
firms producing differentiated products. New firms can enter and established
firms can exit with ease.
In
monopolistic competition, the industry consists of a large number of firms. The
presence of a large number of firms has three implications for the firms in the
industry. First, it’s the small market share. Each firm supplies a small part
of the total industry in monopolistic competition. Therefore, each firm has
only limited power to influence the price of its product. Each firm’s price can
deviate from the average price of other firms by only a relatively small
amount. This implication is described as small market share.
An
example for this is when the Blackberry Company attacked Apple indirectly in
their television commercial where a blackberry went straight through an apple.
Apple later on came up with a comeback via a television commercial as well,
indirectly attacking them where the blackberry fell apart upon hitting the
apple. A competitive competition such as so, leads many retailers to
desperation for survival in the industry.
Apart from that, a firm might also alter the prices of their
products according to the desirability of them based on the season and so on.
This is determined by the elastic of the products that may be elastic, or
inelastic.
Diagram 1 shows that as price increases, the percentage
change in demand is lesser than the percentage change in price. This shows that
during a peak season where people demand more for the firm’s product, a change
in the price will not affect the demand for the product abruptly.
Diagram
2 shows that as price increase, the percentage change in demand is greater than
the percentage change in price. This shows that during a normal season, a
change in price will affect the demand of the product greatly as compared to
Diagram 1, during the peak season. A retail firm might increase the fare during
the peak season because the elasticity of demand is inelastic and elastic when
it is during the normal season.
Monopolistic
Competition is a market structure where a large number of firms compete, each
producing differentiated products based on the quality of the product, price,
and marketing strategies. Firms are also free to enter and exit the industry.
In this competitive market, firms compete with other using various ways and
strategies, such as giving out free ‘goodies’, increasing discounts, also
attacking each other indirectly or directly via commercials and advertisements.
These are the ways for the firms to survive in the industry with the pressure
from the competitive competition, but are only efficient to a certain extent.
To
conclude, in Monopolistic Competition, retailers need a compelling offer in
order to justify their existence in the retail industry. This pushes the
retailers to come up with different, brilliant ideas and strategies to tackle
the consumers and make the sale. Even though the competition is tough in the
retail industry, this competitiveness pushes many retailers to go beyond their
comfort zone, and over the consumers’ expectations to stand out in this
industry. Some of the major brands we have today once started small, and then
worked their way up to where they are today.
Diagram 1 shows that as price increases, the percentage change in demand is lesser than the percentage change in price. This shows that during a peak season where people demand more for the firm’s product, a change in the price will not affect the demand for the product abruptly.
No comments:
Post a Comment